User Profile
God, Family and Country. In that order!
» View Sovereignty Soldier's profile
» Send Private Message
Search
Blog Viewer
Re-Education For Lauryn Hill
Friday, July 27 2012 - 06:39 PM
Foreign Troops to Confiscate American
Foreign Troops to Confiscate American Guns Under UN Treaty
Aaron Dykes
Infowars.com
July 27, 2012
“Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order … tomorrow they will be grateful.” -Attributed to Henry Kissinger during the 1991 Bilderberg meeting
For those who’ve been wondering how the domestic gun grabbers or the United Nations think they’re going to get away with gun control here at home, one need look no further than Article 15 of the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty.
Many American troops are patriots who understand their oaths to uphold the Constitution, so they can’t be counted upon to confiscate guns. But foreign troops are another story.
Article 15 of the UN Arms Trade Treaty, if ratified, provides for foreign “assistance to implement the Treaty,” and mandates that nations who can provide requested support must do so if requested by member nations. That includes legal, financial, technical as well as “material” assistance to enforce a treaty that declares “recreational, cultural, historical and sporting activities” to be the “exclusively” recognized reasons for lawful private ownership, and which further recognizes the “inherent rights” of the State (i.e. nations under the treaty) to self-defense, but makes no mention of the rights of the individual.
Read the language of Article 15 for yourself:
Article 15
International Assistance
In fulfilling the obligation of this Treaty, States Parties may seek, inter alia, legal assistance, legislative assistance, technical assistance, institutional capacity building, material assistance or financial assistance. States, in a position to do so, shall provide such assistance. States Parties may contribute resources to a voluntary trust fund to assist requesting States Parties requiring such assistance to implement the Treaty.
States Parties shall afford one another the widest measure of assistance, consistent with their respective legal and administrative systems, in investigations, prosecutions and judicial proceedings in relation to the violations of the national measures implemented to comply with obligations under of the provisions of this Treaty.
Each State Party may offer or receive assistance, inter alia, through the United Nations international, regional, subregional or national organizations, non-governmental organizations or on a bi-lateral basis. Such assistance may include technical, financial, material and other forms of assistance as needed, upon request.
Will foreign troops be going door-to-door to ensure compliance with new gun registry policies, imposed limits on ammunition and magazines, or in enforcing outright confiscation? Joint training exercises conducted between U.S. armed forces and various foreign armies have trained to do just that.
In 2010, the Infowars crew covered Operation Vigilant Guard, a joint training exercise in Chicago, in which U.S. troops drilled with Eastern bloc troops to partner in stopping terrorism, dealing with meth dealers and WMDs, as well as in gun confiscation. Countless other exercises have taken place on U.S. soil involving similar joint operations for a martial law occupation with the participation of foreign troops:
Foreign Troops Training To Confiscate Guns of Americans
American troops were ordered to conduct door-to-door gun confiscation sweeps after Hurricane Katrina, and while it has emerged that at least one unit stood down and refused the order, many more carried out the unconstitutional mission. That precedent has been followed by other exercises training American soldiers for gun seizures, along with other martial law measures.
Infowars Nightly News co-host Rob Dew underscored the history of training to take American guns in his recent viral report:
Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns
Meanwhile, the United Nations itself has forcibly disarmed numerous African nations using foreign troops, and the vacuum of power has led in several cases to genocidal atrocities as a direct result of taking away arms. The genocide in Rwanda was enabled by forcible disarmament. As Republic Magazine writes, the mass murder was “carried out by government-aligned Hutu tribal militias against a targeted ethnic population – the Tutsis – who had been disarmed with the help of UN “peacekeeping” forces under the supervision of future UN Secretary General Kofi Annan.” The Darfur crisis in Sudan also has its roots in UN-led population disarmament, as does the Burma (Myanmar) massacre, again the result of disarmament. Armed troops representing international interests including the World Bank burned down homes and killed children in effort to forcibly evict some 40,000 Ugandans on the basis of conserving lands to combat climate change.
Indeed, genocide and disarmed populations go hand-in-hand through history– just look at the history of Democide (death by government). R.J. Rummel at the University of Hawaii is the leading academic on the subject, and has estimated that more than 262 million unnatural deaths in the 20th Century alone were caused by government, and most were at the hands of despots preying upon their helpless peoples. From Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia, to Turkey, Armenia and beyond, gun bans have created a shift in the balance of power towards the state, creating an atmosphere of victim disarmament.
Blue helmets or foreign uniforms have no place on foreign soil, yet the UN Arms Trade Treaty text reveals a mechanism to impose just that type of control– even in America.
Read the treaty text for yourself and see our report from yesterday: Bombshell: Leaked UN Treaty Does Ban Guns
Similar/Related Articles
Foreign Troops Training To Confiscate Guns of Americans
Proof: UN Plans To Ban American Guns
Video: National Guard Helping Confiscate Guns in New York State
Oath Keepers Proves That There WERE Troops Who Refused to Confiscate Guns During Katrina
Bombshell: Leaked UN Treaty Does Ban Guns
Toronto Cops Confiscate Guns in “Safe-city Initiative”
Foreign Secretary Miliband: No “Bamboozling or Bulldozing” of Irish Over Lisbon Treaty
Obama Administration Participates in Finalizing UN Gun Grabbing Treaty
Treason in New York, National Guard Confiscating Guns from Citizens
START Treaty is Really the United Nations Global Military Regime Treaty
Forbes Op-ed Voices Opposition to Gun-grabbing U.N. Treaty
While we’re all watching the gulf: Hillary signs UN Small Arms Treaty
AV Town Crier says...
SS
I’m with you. Under NO circumstance would I obey any order or cooperate in any way with ANY foreign agent. If need be, I would arm myself and consider myself in a state of war against a conquering nation. I would act accordingly.
( send private message )
Sovereignty Soldier says...
Just like the “muslims” do in their nations. We love to mourn our troop losses and get angry at those who killed them but what would you do if foreign troops invaded your country? What about when a few “bad apples” murder or rape a civilian? Of course you would try to destroy all of the invaders. It’s all a matter of looking at things from different points of view. If you obey and invade without congress declaring war, your in the wrong and there are consequences.
( send private message )
AV Town Crier says...
The reason that the last time congress declared war was WWII. The reason is simple; if congress declares war, they’re out of the picture from that moment on. It’s up to the Commander-in-chief, and the joint chiefs to prosecute the war. The country goes into a pseudo (de facto) martial law. War-time commissions start regulating everything as the war effort gets top priority. Congress-weasels like Nancy ‘the clueless’ Pelosi can’t take junkets to the war zone and get their pictures taken and make public speeches (either for or against the war) for political gain.
Under the current way of doing things (from the Korean War, Vietnam to current wars) you have boots on the ground, and you have politicians making all these wars political and used for personal/political gains.
This practice needs to be outlawed. It’s criminal. The president should only have the power to act in certain emergencies and only long enough for congress to either declare a state of war or bail. They need to grow a pair.
(
send private message
)
Sovereignty Soldier says...
They are blackmailed, threatened, or just sold out to evil. That is why all of them, with the exception of those who received Ron Pauls endorsement, need to go. If you cannot or will not abide by the constitution, you have no business in any government position. If elections are rigged, then they need to be arrested and removed from office.
( send private message )
Cagy Wolf says...
I would not obey nor condone any foreign troops on US soil, I would consider them a hostile force along with the government that invited them onto US soil. Sad thing is only a few of us would fight, someone mentioned that Cyberidiot would stay with the women and children, I disagree he would hide behind the women and chidren as would Matt and many other misguided and foolish people.
( send private message )
Would you like to comment on this blog post? Login to talk back!
Sovereignty Soldier says...
If they bring foreign troops on American soil and operate against the people, maybe then people will understand why there are so many roadside IEDs in other nations that we have troops in. They do not like foreign invaders anymore than Americans will like it.
( send private message )