intheav.com Blogs - American - My Blog

WTF? Top 2 in CA.!?!?

Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:28:22 +0000

Has Lol this is gonna do we are being taken over before our eyes!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ygl82lgUuE&feature=youtube_gdata_player

OK intheav BLOGGERS...Love You All, so let's begin local reform here by....

Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:55:17 +0000

...let's begin reform here at the local level. We are uniquely situated in an area where we can influence some of the major policy goings on in our society. But it MUST start LOCALLY...this is a good motivating video to get started.

Hey guys, it's been a while...let's start this debate....

Sun, 23 Dec 2012 06:43:52 +0000

OK�I don�t always listen to Alex Jones, but this is a clip that I COMPLETELY agree with. Those that have wondered if another country was mad enough to try and take us out, especially through California because of it�s strategically close geographic location near Asia through the Pacific, this is for you. But remember, as Ron Paul says...the most efficient national defense we have is FREEDOM and the 2nd Amendment...here is a calling call to all patriotic Americans

No lyrics, just good epic sound. Sit back and enjoy!!

Fri, 13 Jul 2012 05:00:50 +0000

I love the picture of Jesus about to kick the devil's ass...I'm gonna get this tattooed on my back to cover up some old "not so attractive" ones I got in my partying days.

WOW!! 2 beautiful children with more common sense than most politicians.

Thu, 24 May 2012 05:53:00 +0000

Lets shoot em down. Free the A.V. skies from those fascist punks.

Fri, 18 May 2012 07:16:04 +0000

Calls on FB for the first DAY....then PUT contracts for 3 months!!!!

Fri, 18 May 2012 03:25:29 +0000

Any other Facebook investment strategies before this bad boy openis its IPO tomorrow???

OK, My take on Romney vs. Obama

Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:58:13 +0000

This is a good reflection on how I've been feeling, pretty funny...LOL!!! It would be a lot funnier if it wasn't so serious of an election.

This will only take a minute of your time...

Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:25:03 +0000

This is what I am talking about...

This is why Ron Paul's foreign affairs are EXACTLY geared for the proper way towards peace. It has SO MUCH to do with FREE TRADE!!! FOR EVERYONE!!!

Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:10:54 +0000

Jan 5 2012, 5:22 PM ET 45 A week ago Ron Paul tried to convey how the ever-tightening sanctions on Iran--which may soon include an embargo on its oil--look from an Iranian point of view: It's as if China were to blockade the Gulf of Mexico, he said--"an act of war". This is sheer conjecture; Ron Paul is no expert on Iran. But now someone who does have relevant credentials has weighed in, and the picture he paints is disturbingly reminiscent of the one Paul painted. It suggests we may be closer to war than most people realize. Vali Nasr, in addition to being a highly respected expert on the Middle East, belongs to a family that, according to Lobelog's sources, has "a direct line into Iranian Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's inner circle." In a Bloomberg View piece that is getting a lot of attention, Nasr reports that "Iran has interpreted sanctions that hurt its oil exports, which account for about half of government revenue, as acts of war." Indeed, the Iranian leadership now sees U.S. policy as "aimed at regime change." In this light, Iran's recent threats--notably that it will close the Strait of Hormuz in response to an oil embargo--shouldn't be dismissed, says Nasr. "The regime in Tehran is ready for a fight." The good news is that Nasr thinks war can be averted. The bad news is that to accomplish this America and other Western powers need to "imagine how the situation looks from Tehran"--not exactly a favorite pastime among American politicians these days. Still, if only for the intellectual exercise, let's do try to imagine what things look like from Iran's point of view. Iran's nuclear scientists have recently evinced a tendency to get assassinated, and a mysterious explosion at a military facility happened to kill the general in charge of Iran's missile program. These things were almost certainly done by Israel, possibly with American support. If you were Iranian, would you consider assassinations on your soil grounds for attacking the suspected perpetrators? Well, we know that some notable Americans think assassinating people on American soil is punishable by war. After the alleged Iranian plot to assassinate a Saudi Ambassador in Washington was uncovered, Bill Kristol (whom you may recall from our previous run-up to a disastrous war) recommended that we attack Iran. But I'm guessing that if I tried this Iran-America analogy out on Kristol, he might detect asymmetries. For example: We're us, whereas they're just them. Underlying our Iran strategy is the assumption that if we keep ratcheting up the pressure, the regime will eventually say uncle. A problem with this premise is that throughout human history rulers have shown an aversion to being seen by their people as surrendering. Indeed, when you face dissent, as the Iranian regime does, there's actually a certain appeal to confronting an external threat, since confrontation tends to consolidate domestic support. As Nasr puts it, "the ruling clerics are responding with shows of strength to boost solidarity at home." This doesn't mean Iran's rulers haven't wanted to make a deal. But it does mean the deal would have to leave these rulers with a domestically plausible claim to have benefited from it, and it also means these leaders can't afford to be seen begging for the deal. When President Ahmadinejad visited New York last year, he gave reporters unmistakable signals that he wanted to negotiate, but the Obama administration chose to ignore them. After Ahmadinejad "went home empty handed," reports Nasr, power increasingly shifted to Iranians who argued for confrontation over diplomacy. Even so, Iran's foreign minister made another appeal to re-open talks only days ago, suggesting that they be held in Turkey. But, as the New York Times reported, western nations interpreted this overture "as an effort by Iran to buy time to continue its program." Got that? If Iranians refuse to negotiate it means they don't want a deal, and if they ask to negotiate it means they don't want a deal. Nasr says the tightening of the screws is making Iran increasingly determined to get nuclear weapons--not to start a war, but to prevent one. Having seen what happened to Muammar Qaddafi, says Nasr, Iran's leaders worry that foreign powers would "feel safe enough to interfere in the affairs of a non-nuclear-armed state." This is the kind of thing Ron Paul presumably had in mind when he said Iran may want nuclear weapons in order to get some "respect." But hey, what does Ron Paul know?

Love It!!! Reform at the Top and LET THAT TRICKLE DOWN!!! Watch out Fascist leaders of ALL municipalities LARGE and SMALL!!!

Mon, 28 Nov 2011 05:34:58 +0000

THIS IS FROM YAHOO NEWS!! COMMENTARY | It's been fun to watch Texas Congressman Ron Paul this year. He comes across as a nervous little fellow at times, but he has some truly good ideas and some really off-the-wall ideas too. He was virtually ignored by everyone for months, but lately seems to be the candidate that everyone is now watching. The Daily Caller reported Paul was the topic of conversation by all the talking heads on Sunday's installment of "This Week." Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan even went so far as to say Paul can give President Barack Obama a run for the money. I'm not so sure about that. Paul definitely has a loyal set of supporters -- there's no question about that. Articles that praise Ron Paul receive mass praise from his supporters too. But, be the least bit critical of the retiring congressman and masses of negative comments pour in too. It would be laughable if we weren't discussing the future of our country. That's one thing I really like about Paul and his supporters: They get it. They understand the United States is facing serious challenges and it's going to take more than a good sound bite to cure the nation's ills. They understand that the deficit is out of control. They know that a radical new approach is needed in Washington if we are going to avoid a financial collapse on a scale that this country has never seen before. What they don't get, however, is it takes more than just a good idea to win the nomination. And, without the nomination, there is no chance of winning the White House. Paul has to begin winning over mainstream Republicans to secure the nomination. He will win Iowa -- his supporters know how to work the caucus system. That will generate enormous momentum for Paul as he heads to the New Hampshire primaries. Primaries, however, are a different political animal. He's going to have to appeal to the masses and get them to the polls. I definitely was not following Paul this year, but I can say he has won my curiosity. He is a viable alternative to the GOP pack that seems to be saying what Americans want to hear and not what they need to hear. His ideas may be a bit radical at times, but he's got a foundation to work from in crafting new alternatives to governing. I like that. ..

I FOUND IT! I thought it was lost for good, but NO WAY JOSE GONZO BATES....Check this out!!!

Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:47:56 +0000

I saw the debate on the internet after it aired,and EVERY place cut this particular part out. You cant find it anywhere.....EXCEPT NOW....Here it is on the question about Rick Perry joining the race, (this was right before he officially announced, even though those of us who pay attention to the global elites knew he was going to run being the Bilderberg choice for the GOP).

The best speech from the Republican Leadership Conference

Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:44 +0000

And without further ado ( is that how you spell it)...anyways...here is...the one....the only....

View of the U.S.of A around the world, and is continuing at an alarmingly rapid pace...this needs to change. VOTE FOR RON PAUL 2012!!!

Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:34:33 +0000

Dear Western Leaders: Please shut up By: Mike Tudoreanu | February 06, 2011 | ShareThis Courtesy blog.uswtmc.org The peoples of the Arab world are rising. It started in Tunisia, spread to Egypt, and there are rumblings of discontent in Yemen, Jordan and Sudan. Corrupt dictators, who have ignored the needs of the many and pandered to the interests of big business for decades, finally have reason to be afraid. One of them, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali of Tunisia, has already fled his sinking ship. In Egypt, Hosni Mubarak seems determined to go down fighting, and take as many innocent lives as possible with him. In Yemen, Ali Abdullah Saleh quickly announced that he will quit later this year, and the protests have only just begun. All three of them have ruled for over 20 years � almost 30 in Mubarak�s case. The King of Jordan is also looking worried. Saudi Arabia is quiet at the moment, but the amazingly rich � and amazingly repressive � House of Saud is probably concerned about the family business. Democracy is coming to the Middle East, and it looks like secular democracy. Young Arabs do not seem to share the West�s obsession with political Islam, and religion is no more than a background issue at best. Islamic extremists exist, but they were caught by surprise and left in the dust. Egyptian Muslims and Christians are marching in the streets side by side. Western leaders have been talking about stuff like this for years. One would expect them to be overjoyed at the prospect of a democratic Middle East. But instead, they look concerned and somber. They call for �stability,� not freedom or democracy. The problem, you see, is that most of the endangered dictators are their friends. Mubarak alone receives $1.5 billion in US military aid every year. Some Western leaders have made clear where their sympathies lie, and it�s not with the people of Egypt. Joe Biden said in a recent interview that he doesn�t think Mubarak is a dictator. That�s right: a man who has been president for 30 years and was, until recently, planning to hand over power to his son; a man who relies on a brutal secret police; a man who keeps �winning� elections just as free as the ones that used to be �won� by Saddam Hussein; a man who routinely imprisons people who speak out against him � this man is not a dictator. Why is that again? Because, in Joe Biden�s own words, �Mubarak has been an ally of ours in a number of things and he�s been very responsible on, relative to geopolitical interests in the region, Middle East peace efforts, the actions Egypt has taken relative to normalizing the relationship with Israel.� So, apparently, being a friend of the US automatically makes you okay no matter how often you send your thugs to beat up or kill innocent people. Even worse were the comments of Tony Blair. Just this Wednesday, he actually had the audacity to say that Mubarak is �extremely courageous and a force for good.� Now, bear in mind, this is Tony Blair we�re talking about, the second most enthusiastic supporter of the Iraq War. The former British Prime Minister who said he had to send troops to overthrow Saddam Hussein despite massive anti-war protests, because removing a dictator was the right thing to do. Now he sings the praises of a different dictator and compliments him on his great courage � presumably the courageous way he decided to repress the protesters calling for his resignation. I used to think Tony Blair had misguided principles, now I see he has no principles at all. The hypocrisy of Western leaders is utterly shocking. Tyrants who oppose the interests of Western capitalism are evil dictators who must be removed by force in the name of justice and freedom. If some people get killed in the process, well, that�s just collateral damage. Tyrants who support the interests of Western capitalism, on the other hand, are responsible and courageous forces for good, and totally not dictators. When people rise up against them to demand affordable food and fewer jackboots in their faces, well, that�s just rude. You see, it�s oh so very destabilizing when you topple a dictator- sorry, I mean a courageous leader. Before you know it, there might be free elections, and that means we don�t know who�s going to win! It might be anyone! Imagine that. Sarcasm aside, can you imagine what would have happened if people were protesting on the streets of Iran instead of Egypt? Actually, you don�t need to imagine, it happened last year. Predictably, Western leaders immediately called for democracy and the resignation of Ahmadinejad � who does count as a dictator, apparently, even though he has far less power than Mubarak. It is now clear as day that the only things Western politicians care about are their own interests, and they are equally willing to support a democracy or a brutal dictatorship as long as it is self-serving. The fact that these people can support Mubarak (or the House of Saud for that matter) while fighting wars for �democracy� elsewhere is frankly sickening. Western leaders have completely lost any right to talk about democracy anywhere in the world.

ATTN: Black People...Dont be fooled!!!!!

Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:58:42 +0000

This is the kind of knowledge I like to see being spread....grassroots, homegrown....straight truth